Advertisement
Democracy in Africa
- ‹ previous
- 3 of 235
- next ›
Corruption in Africa
- ‹ previous
- 3 of 83
- next ›
Libya Descending
- ‹ previous
- 3 of 159
- next ›
Congo, Perpetual Crises
- ‹ previous
- 3 of 100
- next ›
Evidence of Airstrike in South Sudan
Alkhabar Staff
13/09/2013
The Satellite Sentinel Project has independently confirmed an aerial bombardment of a Sudan People’s Liberation Army military installation in the town of Jau in South Sudan’s Unity State, the Enough Project reported Friday.
The South Sudanese army’s continued occupation of Jau, which is located within the Safe Demilitarized Border Zone straddling the two countries’ contested border, is a violation of the two countries’ recent recommitment to abide by security arrangements.
Jau has been the subject of territorial dispute and the site of previous clashes between the two countries’ armed forces in December 2011 and February 2012.
Notwithstanding South Sudan’s current non-compliance with its agreement to demilitarize its border areas, the Sudanese government’s aerial bombardment of Jau is an illegal use of force under international law.
Digital Globe panchromatic imagery of the fortified town of Jau from September 8, 2013 shows a crater, approximately 7 meters in diameter, consistent with aerial bombardment. According to DigitalGlobe Analytics, at least two tent structures were destroyed by the bomb blast, the report said.
At least one more bomb crater was noted north of the town. Neither crater was visible in July 12, 2013 imagery of the same area, the report added.
Sources on the ground corroborated reports that a Sudan Armed Forces jet dropped a bomb in Jau on September 7, 2013.
Major Gen. James Koang Chuol, Commander of the Fourth division of the SPLA reported that a soldier and his wife died, and six people were injured, as a result of the bombardment.
The South Sudanese armed forces maintain three separately secured military installations in the Jau region, all within 4 kilometers of the center line and all within the SDBZ.
Continuing to maintain armed forces at these facilities is a clear violation of the two countries’ bilateral agreement to maintain a 20 kilometer wide demilitarized zone along their border.
By targeting a historic flash point for violence at a sensitive moment, the attack has heightened bilateral tensions between the two countries.
Add new comment